Makers and Takers: Why conservatives work harder, feel happier, have closer families, take fewer drugs, give more generously, value honesty more, are less materialistic and | 
enlarge | Author: Peter Schweizer Publisher: Doubleday Category: Book
List Price: $24.95 Buy New: $8.50 You Save: $16.45 (66%)
New (39) Collectible (1) from $8.50
Avg. Customer Rating: 21 reviews Sales Rank: 35895
Media: Hardcover Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 272 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9 Dimensions (in): 8.2 x 5.9 x 1.2
ISBN: 038551350X Dewey Decimal Number: 320.50973 EAN: 9780385513500 ASIN: 038551350X
Publication Date: June 3, 2008 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Condition: never read, excellent condition
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
In Makers and Takers you will discover why:
* Seventy-one percent of conservatives say you have an obligation to care for a seriously injured spouse or parent versus less than half (46 percent) of liberals.
* Conservatives have a better work ethic and are much less likely to call in sick than their liberal counterparts.
* Liberals are 2 times more likely to be resentful of others’ success and 50 percent more likely to be jealous of other people’s good luck.
* Liberals are 2 times more likely to say it is okay to cheat the government out of welfare money you don’t deserve.
* Conservatives are more likely than liberals to hug their children and “significantly more likely” to display positive nurturing emotions.
* Liberals are less trusting of family members and much less likely to stay in touch with their parents.
* Do you get satisfaction from putting someone else’s happiness ahead of your own? Fifty-five percent of conservatives said yes versus only 20 percent of liberals.
* Rush Limbaugh, Ronald Reagan, Bill O’Reilly and Dick Cheney have given large sums of money to people in need, while Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Michael Moore, and Al Gore have not.
* Those who are “very liberal” are 3 times more likely than conservatives to throw things when they get angry. The American left prides itself on being superior to conservatives: more generous, less materialistic, more tolerant, more intellectual, and more selfless. For years scholars have constructed—and the media has pushed—elaborate theories designed to demonstrate that conservatives suffer from a host of personality defects and character flaws. According to these supposedly unbiased studies, conservatives are mean-spirited, greedy, selfish malcontents with authoritarian tendencies. Far from the belief of a few cranks, prominent liberals from John Kenneth Galbraith to Hillary Clinton have succumbed to these prejudices. But what do the facts show?
Peter Schweizer has dug deep—through tax documents, scholarly data, primary opinion research surveys, and private records—and has discovered that these claims are a myth. Indeed, he shows that many of these claims actually apply more to liberals than conservatives. Much as he did in his bestseller Do as I Say (Not as I Do), he brings to light never-before-revealed facts that will upset conventional wisdom.
Conservatives such as Ronald Reagan and Robert Bork have long argued that liberal policies promote social decay. Schweizer, using the latest data and research, exposes how, in general:
* Liberals are more self-centered than conservatives. * Conservatives are more generous and charitable than liberals. * Liberals are more envious and less hardworking than conservatives. * Conservatives value truth more than liberals, and are less prone to cheating and lying. * Liberals are more angry than conservatives. * Conservatives are actually more knowledgeable than liberals. * Liberals are more dissatisfied and unhappy than conservatives.
Schweizer argues that the failure lies in modern liberal ideas, which foster a self-centered, “if it feels good do it” attitude that leads liberals to outsource their responsibilities to the government and focus instead on themselves and their own desires.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 16 more reviews...
I was expecting more August 12, 2008 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Based on the jacket I thought this book would be like Millionaire Next Door but for politics. In Millionaire you find that the guy with the used car and jeans is a millionaire. In the book I was hoping for some defense of my positions. Like you'd find the guy with the short hair who votes Republican is actually the most generous and caring guy on the block. But that's not what this book is. It has moments when it is that. But, for the most part, it is just rehashing of some of the stupidest things said by people who, for the most part, aren't even in politics. For example, Al Franken tackling some college kid because he supports lower taxes, or whatever. Yeah, granted, Al Franken is outrageous. But what does that really say about the average Republican or Democrat? It says nothing. I suspect the truth is that the exact same percentage of caring and generous people exist on both sides of the aisle. They just have different ways of showing it.
But are the surveys reliable? August 3, 2008 The argument of Makers and Takers is that conservatives have it right, behaviorally, and liberals are deeply troubled. Thus, it will give heart to the right and dyspepsia to the left, though it is written in the spirit of bemused interest, not in that of an angry screed. The core of the argument is built upon survey research. If the survey research is accurate, this is a significant book, for it traces a large number of behaviors which, it is argued, characterize those of each broadly-conceived political persuasion. Schweizer argues that behavior and ideas are closely intertwined and proceeds, he believes, to demonstrate it here.
With all turning on the reliability of his evidence, there is a consistent attempt to correct for potential survey errors. For example, conservatives are more happy with their incomes than are liberals. That could be, of course, because they make more money. However, Schweizer is careful to point out, in this case, that the liberals skew toward the negative, while the conservatives skew toward the positive when, in fact, they each make the same amount of money. Conservatives are likely to see the book as successfully and scientifically confirming their intuitions, while liberals are likely to see it as little more than polemic and propaganda. It all comes down to the reliability of the survey instruments themselves. Schweizer certainly takes them seriously, but how broadly accepted are they by dispassionate social scientists? I believe that it is a shortcoming of the book that he does not go to great pains to assure his readers (with hard evidence) that these survey instruments are reliable. There is also a great deal of anecdotal evidence, but that is notoriously slippery, though it does make for an interesting read. Unfortunately, since the book is written for a popular audience it is unlikely to be reviewed by survey research experts and be validated or dismissed. That is too bad, since the subject is so important. On the other hand, a popular audience will find it to be an interesting and engaging use of statistical information (particularly those who are conservative).
Better than average conservative propaganda ... August 3, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Schweitzer's characterization of Liberal arrogance and self-absorption is right on the mark but the "facts" used to support some of his conclusions are a little thin. He relies heavily on anecdotal evidence and polling data that reeks of subjective bias, then he interprets it out of context.
Particularly annoying is his contention that Liberal attitudes toward child rearing are selfish and civically irresponsible, as if propagation of an individual's genes isn't the ultimate act of self interest. If he wanted to prove that point, he should have looked at adoption statistics ... or maybe he did.
Schweitzer does a good job of deflating the Liberal version of conventional wisdom but in so doing relies on a few conservative myths. I suppose it would be asking too much for a touch of balance.
A fascinating and insightful read August 1, 2008 9 out of 12 found this review helpful
Anyone who is not a liberal has noted how they continuously heap praise upon themselves for their moral superiority, while at the same time demonstrating a priggish hostility to those who disagree with them. In this fascinating book, the author undertakes to examine the liberals' mindset, contrasting their words with their deeds. Everything is covered here, from helping the poor (who actually gives the most of their own income to the needy), to just plain being happy. Want to understand the real, bedrock differences between conservatives and liberals? Read this book!
Overall, I found this to be a fascinating and insightful read. The author does an excellent job of comparing and contrasting people's words with their actual deeds, drawing on many public and private sources, including many surveys and scientific studies. I think that this is a very interesting book, and I cannot recommend it enough!
Good, but could have been better July 25, 2008 5 out of 6 found this review helpful
It's been anecdotally the consensus for awhile that conservatives are generally happier, more family-oriented, and so forth than liberals, but until Schweizer's book, no one had bothered to amass the necessary statistics on the matter. MAKERS AND TAKERS does our understanding of American society a considerable service in this.
There are two areas where Schweizer's tome could have been improved. First, its self-congratulatory tone would be off-putting to a liberal -- and it's liberals who would benefit most from absorbing and pondering the objective information it offers. Second, Schweizer had the opportunity to score a grand slam by extending his treatment to FAKERS: persons nominally self-supporting, but whose positions are mostly or wholly sinecures that demand little from them. The distribution of political allegiances among such persons -- government workers; featherbedded workers in unionized industries; marginal employees in public schools; and the like -- would be illuminating whether or not it confirmed Schweizer's larger thesis.
All the same, MAKERS AND TAKERS is informative in its objective data and thought-provoking in its implications. Four stars.
|
|
|