The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design | 
enlarge | Author: Richard Dawkins Publisher: W. W. Norton Category: Book
List Price: $15.95 Buy Used: $6.90 You Save: $9.05 (57%)
New (41) Collectible (1) from $9.55
Avg. Customer Rating: 338 reviews Sales Rank: 4198
Media: Paperback Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 400 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1 Dimensions (in): 8.2 x 5.5 x 1.3
ISBN: 0393315703 Dewey Decimal Number: 576.82 EAN: 9780393315707 ASIN: 0393315703
Publication Date: September 19, 1996 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: Expedited shipping available Shipping: International shipping available Condition: Cover has wear on front and corners. No writing. Reading wear to pages. We will ship same day. Shipped w/ care in padded mailing envelopes from a smoke-free environment.
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Richard Dawkins is not a shy man. Edward Larson's research shows that most scientists today are not formally religious, but Dawkins is an in-your-face atheist in the witty British style: I want to persuade the reader, not just that the Darwinian world-view happens to be true, but that it is the only known theory that could, in principle, solve the mystery of our existence. The title of this 1986 work, Dawkins's second book, refers to the Rev. William Paley's 1802 work, Natural Theology, which argued that just as finding a watch would lead you to conclude that a watchmaker must exist, the complexity of living organisms proves that a Creator exists. Not so, says Dawkins: "All appearances to the contrary, the only watchmaker in nature is the blind forces of physics, albeit deployed in a very special way... it is the blind watchmaker." Dawkins is a hard-core scientist: he doesn't just tell you what is so, he shows you how to find out for yourself. For this book, he wrote Biomorph, one of the first artificial life programs. You can check Dawkins's results on your own Mac or PC.
Product Description "The best general account of evolution I have read in recent years."E. O. Wilson. With a new introduction.
Twenty years after its original publication, The Blind Watchmaker, framed with a new introduction by the author, is as prescient and timely a book as ever. The watchmaker belongs to the eighteenth-century theologian William Paley, who argued that just as a watch is too complicated and functional to have sprung into existence by accident, so too must all living things, with their far greater complexity, be purposefully designed. Charles Darwin's brilliant discovery challenged the creationist arguments; but only Richard Dawkins could have written this elegant riposte. Natural selectionthe unconscious, automatic, blind, yet essentially nonrandom process Darwin discoveredis the blind watchmaker in nature.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 333 more reviews...
A Good Introduction To and Defense of Evolution May 11, 2008 2 out of 3 found this review helpful
This book is another fine effort by Richard Dawkins to explain how the complexity of life can be explained by evolution including natural selection. He uses his usual detailed, but laymen type of explanation to explore how various attributes of animals (and man) have come about.
The books closing chapters deal with some of the other theories that exist to try to explain the diversity of life. He does not take a highbrow approach. He explains the core beliefs and concepts of the theories and then using their own words, shows how they can not explain it as well as the theory of evolution can.
I would recommend this book to anyone who is interested in a good discussion of evolution. You will not find an atheist arguing here. You will find a scientist who knows his field and wants you to understand it as well.
The Argument For Design May 9, 2008 4 out of 22 found this review helpful
It is not a stretch of the imagination to claim that scientific evidence supports the idea of a design in Nature. The real argument is not over the presence of design but over the source of the design. Is it the random, ignorant, process of mutation and natural selection esposed by Dawkin`s or the work of an Intelligent Designer.After a full assessment of Dawkin`s book, I opt for the latter.I find it remarkable how often the creativity we find in nature is so similar to human design-albeit, Nature`s are usually more exquisite , optimal, or efficient.
Even IF blind April 17, 2008 3 out of 85 found this review helpful
.....A watchmaker is still a watchmaker, and is presumably still making a watch that works. But whenever we don't understand something in our world, we say that there is no God. We profess to be intelligent beings but we think we know all there is to know, particularly as it concerns God. Sorry, folks, we don't know everything. And when we don't, just say so, don't say there is no God when you really do not know one way or the other. Every time we wonder "why", we say oh God would not do it that way. We would do it this way. We constantly substitute our judgments and viewpoints re what we think God should do. We are not God. So Mr Dawkins is in a field in which he knows absolutely nothing (re the existence or non-existence of a Supreme Being. Neither Dawkins nor anyone else is ever in a position to definitively state that there is no God. But we say it anyway, in our ignorance. Oh well :)
Essence of the scientific method February 24, 2008 4 out of 4 found this review helpful
When I tell friends and family that I am reading (and enjoying) books on natural selection and Darwin I often get challenged that 'God' explains the major gaps in the theories proposed. What I appreciate about this book is that it does not stop with that answer and strives to hypothesize and explain the origin of life and the complexity that has manifested itself in the nature around us. It challenges the reader to understand organic and inorganic chemistry and the fundamental properties of materials that would allow us to explain how it all transpired.
Ironically, this curiousity and desire to learn was forged from an upbringing in a strong Christian family. From my perspective, the fact that 'God' had graced us with the gift of thought and ability to reason was always very natural to the church's teaching of striving for the truth. This is not the same lesson that my 'near fundamentalist' siblings took from a similar upbringing. I am fearful about the religious stories that shape our behaviors today. More often than not religion is a reason not to learn and creates contempt for new ideas and people who articulate those ideas.
This book challenges the reader to learn and dig deeper. It does not ignore the other schools of thought and in fact lays them out with a suitable level of respect. I look forward to uncovering more books about science that embark on this same type of teaching method for complex topics.
Dawkins vs. "Peter", "Paul", "Luke", and "John" February 17, 2008 1 out of 7 found this review helpful
Read the bible (written by anonymous 8th century people called Peter, Paul, Luke, John, and others), and then read The Blind Watchmaker (or any book by Richard Dawkins). One is absurd and the other is perfect sense.
I'd love to see a college professor in the US offer a course that required the reading of these two books only. Perhaps it would raise the American standards for Science (we're embarrassingly low in comparison to the other Industrialized Nations because we simply defend one book at the expense of the other without ever having actually read either in the first place.)
Read this book BEFORE you judge it. It's an incredible experience into reality that beats the bible (I know, I've read them both).
|
|
|