How Cities Work : Suburbs, Sprawl, and the Roads Not Taken | 
enlarge | Author: Alex Marshall Publisher: University of Texas Press Category: Book
List Price: $26.95 Buy New: $16.90 You Save: $10.05 (37%)
New (19) from $16.90
Avg. Customer Rating: 20 reviews Sales Rank: 359926
Media: Paperback Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 288 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1 Dimensions (in): 9.1 x 6 x 0.8
ISBN: 0292752407 Dewey Decimal Number: 307.76 EAN: 9780292752405 ASIN: 0292752407
Publication Date: January 2001 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: International shipping available Condition: Brand New, Perfect Condition, Please allow 4-14 business days for delivery. 100% Money Back Guarantee, Over 1,000,000 customers served.
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
"This is an outstanding book that I hope and expect will make a major contribution to the current debate on cities and suburbs." Robert Fishman, author of American Planning Tradition: Culture and Policy and Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia Do cities work anymore? How did they get to be such sprawling conglomerations of lookalike subdivisions, megafreeways, and "big box" superstores surrounded by acres of parking lots? And why, most of all, don't they feel like real communities? These are the questions that Alex Marshall tackles in this hard-hitting, highly readable look at what makes cities work. Marshall argues that urban life has broken down because of our basic ignorance of the real forces that shape cities-transportation systems, industry and business, and political decision making. He explores how these forces have built four very different urban environments-the decentralized sprawl of California's Silicon Valley, the crowded streets of New York City's Jackson Heights neighborhood, the controlled growth of Portland, Oregon, and the stage-set facades of Disney's planned community, Celebration, Florida. To build better cities, Marshall asserts, we must understand and intelligently direct the forces that shape them. Without prescribing any one solution, he defines the key issues facing all concerned citizens who are trying to control urban sprawl and build real communities. His timely book will be important reading for a wide public and professional audience.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 15 more reviews...
How Cities Work September 28, 2007 4 out of 4 found this review helpful
I bought this book because I wanted an introduction to urban studies without having to slog through a dry, academic textbook. What I got was not really an introduction to the subject, but rather a polemic against the current trends of urban planning, and the ever-growing dominance of suburban sprawl and the personal automobile. This is not to say that Marshall doesn't describe the basics of planning, he does, but this serves mainly as the backbone of his argument; that being that the car and the massive freeway systems that accompany them, have basically destroyed the city and the notion of community. We live in an aimless, rootless society, he argues, with no sense of place or meaning.
He starts by explaining that cities are founded on three basic components; transportation, politics, and economics. What type of city you will have depends on the type of transportation system you have, and the type of transportation you have depends on political decisions. And economics are the whole reason cities exist in the first place argues Marshall, "cities exist because they create wealth."
Marshall spends a good portion of the book criticizing "New Urbanism" which basically embraces suburban sprawl and artificial communities like Celebration, Florida. These communities, argue Marshall are trying to build new urban communities without the transportation systems that are needed to support them, and thus are bound to fail. Marshall supports things like growth boundaries to help revitalize inner cities instead of just continuing to spread outward, eating up more precious land and resources while leaving the center city areas to decay. He supports more government involvement in such matters and thus will make no friends out of the free trader types. Overall, I think Marshall makes a compelling case, although I think he tends to blame too many of societies problems on suburban sprawl. I am a lifelong suburbanite myself and I have a love/hate relationship with the burbs. I like the privacy and convenience it affords me, but I can't help but emphatically agree with this statement by Marshall:
"I believe...that the generally fragmented lives so many of us lead break up marriages, disturb childhoods, isolate people when they most need help, and make life not as much fun. We live, to speak frankly, in one of the loneliest societies on earth."
Can all this be blamed on the car and suburban sprawl? Probably not, but I would whole-heartedly recommend this compelling read anyway. Four stars.
A Well-Rounded Perspective December 22, 2006 Marshall does an exceptional job of telling readers that the form of our cities is based strongly on the choices (and tradeoffs) we make, be they governmental, transportation, economic, or otherwise. The book is a good exploration into how cyclically linked are developers, government, and taxpayers.
Maybe I'm confused, but... April 29, 2006 0 out of 2 found this review helpful
I give this book five stars.
It's a good resource for refuting the New Urbanist horse pucky, and I've seen those ideas crash and burn exactly as he describes. He is dead on with his defense of suburbia and mocking of the pinky raised urban elitist.
Liberal authoritarians hate his idea that cities exist to create wealth. You can see that in some of these reviews.
This is a book a person can read and understand how urban planning affects our lives directly and indirectly. It's worth reading, and, if you're always being criticized for living in "cookie cutter suburbia", has lots of good answers for the snobs.
How Cities Work March 23, 2006 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
For a beginner Public Administration Masters student, this text provided an excellent intro into some far reaching subjects. I used it to focus on the relationship between transportation and urban/suburban growth. The examples were easy to follow and correlated with other professional writings that I have found relating to this discussion thread. I highly recommend this book for getting your feet wet in the transportation side of public administration, or simply for examination of your local communities' current and possible growth concerns.
Wishing for more.... August 6, 2005 8 out of 10 found this review helpful
The author and I had the good fortune to grow up in cities shaped by the street car. Even though the cars were going or gone by the 1950's, many cities retained the urban patterns established sixty and seventy years before. Hoping that light-rail might bring about a return of street car city neighborhoods, I was looking for useful information that might fuel the cause of light-rail. From that aspect the book was disappointing. As a history of 20th century urban development, it seems uneven. Who killed the street cars? Conservative Republicans? In New York City it was LaGardia with backing from the Roosevelt administration. The same was true in city after city through the 1940's and 1950's. Democratic party controlled cities from coast to coast dumped the street car in order to "modernize". Would Mr. Marshall be surprised to know that Paul Weyrich and the conservative Free Congress Foundation are light-rail advocates? Mr. Marshall seems too impassioned in a quest for big government to provide a useful roadmap. Cities such as St. Louis, Denver, Houston, and San Jose hope that building light-rail lines will be followed by dense urban development, without 'growth limits' like those in Portland Oregon or Boulder CO. Why does the author think that will not work? Why would the heavy hand of government in Portland not eventually bring about the same results as Boulder CO? Because they started with more open space? It has to fill up eventually. Why ignore the evidence that light-rail does lead to dense urban redevelopment? Even without growth limits. Why not give people a choice? Suburban sprawl vs. a livable urban environment with light-rail? I say "no thanks" to Disney's fake cities too, but if some folks want to live in one (gag- choke-gasp), it is their choice. Mr. Marshall may still have the last word. Maybe Portland's growth limits are necessary to prevent a suburban ring from choking the central city. I would hope the same could be accomplished by not building any more freeway lanes in dense urban areas. That seems to be on the verge of the politically possible in Denver CO. For those interested in a light-rail revival and the renewal of cities that could bring about, I recommend "Light Rail and Heavy Politics" by Jack McCroskey. Chock full of useful ideas. It discusses the obstacles that arose, and how they were overcome. McCroskey's book is filled with tidbits of useful information that seem to be few and far between in Mr. Marshall's work.
|
|
|